|
The DRM Hall of Shame
In the world of DRM, whether it's bad technology, bad business, bad politics, or what-have you... it will be getting onto this list !
Red Book Audio Anti-Copy
The objective of audio CD anti-copy is to prevent comsumers from putting an audio CD into their Personal Computer and either "ripping" it into reusable music files like MP3s, or burning it to a physical recordable CD... while at the same time ensuring that it plays in all Consumer Electronic CD players.
Even if a given technology could accomplish this objective, most people find it unacceptable because it prevents them from making fair use copies to which they are legally entitled. (Notably, ripping in iTunes for our iPods.)
But technology cannot accomplish this objective.
To put the challenge in general terms, when you try to copy-protect audio CDs, you are trying to force a PC - a $1,000+, state-of-the-art, programmable general-purpose machine - to do LESS than a $50 boom-box with a fixed, 20-year-old design can do. Over and over over again in the last several years, companies such as sunncomm and macrovision have shown how not to do it.
In fall 2003, Sunncomm set what was then the bar for lameness: the "mediamax CD3" system which only works if the user runs extra "copy stopping" software (thoughtfully supplied on the CD) on her PC. As is documented in this paper from Princeton University, if the user uses nefarious piratical means (such as turning "autorun" off on her CD drive) then she can rip and burn to her heart's content.
Then in 2005, Sony did it again with their MediaMax anti-copy system, which involved very sneaky PC-side software, leading them to be accused of installing a rootkit. This accusation was not entirely accurate but it was PR nightmare for Sony which it will take them quite a while to recover from.
Design by DMCA
A specific case of design by lawyer, this lame practice puts "token" content-protection technology in place which content owners know perfectly well can be trivially circumvented by almost any user. But by "circumventing" a content-protection measure, said user -at least in the USA- can be charged with an offence under the Digital Millenium Copyright Act. So, if content owners can't stop 12 year olds from copying music, at least they now have one more way to sue 12-year olds for doing so.
The Biometric MP3 Player
Biometrics has its places, but as this Register article points out, no-one except the company flogging the idea, Veritouch, thinks that MP3 players are among them. This little gem won't play music until it scans your fingerprint. Do I really need to explain in how many ways this is a bad idea ?
|